--- On Tue, 10/14/08, Gabe Menezes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> RESPONSE: Come off it man! No one who has commented on this
> forum, has stated that there is a wide spread Hindu put down of the
> Christian community or for that a Muslim one. You are insinuating
> what has not been  stated on this forum, either simply or categorically
> 

The facts indicate otherwise. Here is what you stated in support of such a 
belief on your part:

"Can you just imagine the carnage that would have befallen  on the
Christian community all over India? This Hindu mindset scares the shit
out of me."

....Gabe Menezes

"I would put it to you that so far, I have seen only valid points being put out 
by the oppressed community"

....Gabe Menezes

> 
>On the other hand it is blatantly clear that you wish to pour emollient >over 
>the the attacks by the Bajrang Dal and its variants...
> 

The above is a blatant falsehood. I have stated that incitement by Hindutva 
outfits is a cause of the riots.

> 
>Before you realised that Murthy had affilations, you were ncock a hoop >about 
>another view!
> 

It is indeed another view, albeit a biased one because of his affiliation. 
Unfortunately, we have not been able to get an unbiased non-partisan account of 
the situation in Orissa from people who have genuine knowledge about the events 
on the ground, about the role of various Hindutva groups and the local 
government, and about the history of disputes between the Kandha and Pana folk.

As for the rest of the material below, you are simply trying hard to fabricate 
various baseless insinuations against me.

Cheers,

Santosh


--- On Tue, 10/14/08, Gabe Menezes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>To put it curtly, there is simply no justification for the attacks on 
>>Christians, no excuse whatsoever, there is simply no other view - not >even 
>yours, that can be excused, to some how suggest that Christians have >brought 
>it upon themselves. That it is not really a Christian Vs Hindu >issue but a 
>tribal one - go tell it to the peasants, in Orissa who are
> on the receiving end.
> 


      

Reply via email to