Hi There,
Im not a lawyer but circumstances and situation points in the direction of the 
sons and relatives of the so called politicians. The so called accused should 
surrender themselves if not guilty and let the system take its course, im sure 
their "DADDY" has tons of money to get them a good lawyer to set them free even 
if their guilty so why hide. Times have changed now its "Guilty untill proven 
Innoncent".

FYI if you have sex with "something" as you put it ( Including Test Tubes or 
bananas) it is not considered rape and the medical report confirmed that it was 
rape if not the would have said that she was sexually active.

As for who the police should arrest i think the laws of the country permits 
arrest of the accused and present them in cour within 24 hours where the 
lawyers can apply for bail.

I cant speak for aires or for you but as far as im concerned i have been taught 
to respect women and i would never stoop to somethinglike this.


--- On Tue, 4/11/08, J. Colaco < jc> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: J. Colaco < jc> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Goanet] German girl Rape Case: BJP MLA’s Son involved too??
> To: "Goa's premiere mailing list, estb. 1994!" <goanet@lists.goanet.org>
> Date: Tuesday, 4 November, 2008, 4:37 PM
> Frank DCruz wrote:  Its been nearly a month and not even a
> single
> arrest even after the medical report confirmed that it was
> a rape. The
> police should drown themselves, if it had to be an
> "Aam Admi" as you
> say then the whole family would have been arrested by now.
> 
> --
> 
> Dear Frank,
> 
> Did the 'medical report' confirm WHO raped the
> young girl?
> 
> Can the 'medical report', at this point, confirm
> WHO raped the young girl?
> 
> I suggest to you that (unless DNA material is available)
> ALL that the
> doctors can confirm is that "in all probability"
> the child had sex
> with someone or something. (In the past, especially in
> certain parts
> of Northern SW India, test-tubes from college labs were the
> favoured
> 'something' for sexual activity.
> 
> I ask, In a HYPOTHETICAL case, Can a 'medical
> report' (unless DNA
> material is available) prove that o senhor test-tube or
> colonel banana
> was not involved?
> 
> And, barring a confession by the alleged perpetrator(s) or
> video
> evidence or corroboration by an eye witness or another
> individual who
> also may have been involved, May I ask whom the police
> should arrest?
> 
> Mark you, I understand the bizarre law as it stands in Goa.
> In Goa, an
> accused has to prove that he did not rape the victim
> concerned. The
> State (i.e. police/prosecution) does not have to prove
> that.
> 
> Could you (if you are in Goa) or Aires prove that you guys
> did not
> rape Jamina (a fictitious name) - according to the strange
> Goa laws?
> 
> Honestly, initially I thought that this was some Kangaroo
> law that Goa
> had enacted. Now I am beginning to believe that  this is
> how 'lawyers'
> and politicians at the time permanently got rid of
> political and
> 'land' opponents using the equally bizarre
> "law" of the Inquisition.
> 
> sincerely
> 
> jc


      Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to 
http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/

Reply via email to