--- On Mon, 12/1/08, Gilbert Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The greater sin on Goanet, and I have pointed this out on a > few occasions, is the tendency to misconstrue, intentionally > or unintentionally, what is written in plain English. And > then respond to some weired interpretation of what is > written, or to some tangential point. This was my reading of > the original response to Marshal's post. >
Gilbert has committed the greater sin on Goanet. He has intentionally or unintentionally misconstrued my response, written in plain English, to Marshall's post. In my opinion nobody on Goanet has a greater need than Gilbert to follow the free unsolicited comical advice that he offers to others while falling into his own trap, as usual. Please see the rest of his campy post appended below. People who have some experience publishing original articles, abiding by all the ethical guidelines, can never be so clueless about the well-recognized ethical issues that Teotoniobab, Bosco, Mario and I have raised - tampering with the text of other people's articles without informing them, and politicization of a solemn tribute to a fallen hero in the midst of a national tragedy. Cheers, Santosh Gilbert Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If fact my reading of some posts, have their sole > aim to rebut / parasite on other people's posts. This > has been voiced by quite a few individuals, and as a reason > not to contribute to Goanet. We should use another > person's posts to build on, rather than use other > peoples' writings unabashedly for target practice. >
