*Santosh: *The above claim of lack of evidence is a deliberate deception. I have provided evidence for two versions of the article, claimed to be written by the same author, one of which (TOI version) is a cheap politicized version.
Response: 1. Santosh is well aware that www.faithfreedom.org is a blog where articles are posted by readers and are therefore subject to amendments / changes/ deletions whereas Times of India is a national newspaper of over 100 years old standing and has a legal responsibility for the matter published therein. 2. The article was published in the ToI on the 28th Nov 2008 whereas it was posted on the blog on 29th Nov 2008. It is therefore very clear which is the original. 3. If Santosh is convinced that the article in ToI has been tampered with, he should have the courage of his convictions to write to .the editor of ToI and say so. The very fact that he does not do so, says it all. Santosh: Please note that one with "The Sad End of Hemant Karkare" as the title is likely to be the original version, despite appearing on the internet at a later date. This is because that version was in an unedited form with some minor grammatical errors and ambiguities Response: This is convoluted logic at its best. Logic turned upside down. The article on the blog is considered original because it suits Santosh. The goal posts are being shifted so that a goal can be scored. Regards, Marshall