--- On Sun, 12/21/08, J. Colaco < jc> <cola...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>The way the opponents of the Orissa Act argued the case, I submit, would
>>have given the "Christians" special privileges which would would violate >the
>principle of equality.
>
Dear Josebab,
Thanks for this clarification. Phew! I agree that there is no fundamental right
to convert.
As you know, on this issue I am more concerned about elimination of the
motivation to dispense empathy rather than enlightenment.
Cheers,
Santosh
--- On Sun, 12/21/08, J. Colaco < jc> <cola...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It is worth noting that Courts rule on the 'issues'
> before them. All
> the SC has stated, in this case, is that there is NO
> "fundamental
> right to convert". I doubt such a "fundamental
> right" exists in any
> country.
>
> This does not make conversions illegal.
>
