On 14 June 2010 15:35, anil desai <[email protected]> wrote: > If I wanted to set cat amongst the pigeons, I could say that you are > praising Aires, an old friend of mine, because he is a Parrikar supporter.
Supporter? My good friend Aires is consistently inconsistent. But then, some are known to make a virtue of inconsistency. Since he is an intelligent man, using good arguments, it's very confusing to keep track of his stands and intents. The most amazing thing is that he is convincing both when he makes a point, and later when he choses to make an exactly opposite point :-) Of course, I thought he was stretching things too far when he once took his anti-strays tirade to new highs, and claimed that a stray dog banged his friend's car (or something to that effect). Normally, it would be the other way round, or is it just our anti-car bias showing :-) FN PS: Might as well make the most of criticising Aires while we have the freedom to. When he becomes a judge, even the above would be contempt of course :-)
