Good work young padawan :-)
On 1/23/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/23/07, Fábio Mierlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Cool, but a recipe can be "part_of" more than one meta-recipe. > > Yes, in practice it can happen. I took a look in our subversion tree, > which holds +1700 recipes, where 57 are meta. From these 57 there's no > replication of includes. There are, however, 2 cases where "standard > recipes" are included, namely DBH and Esound (and I'm not sure about > the former), listed in the XFCE and Enlightenment recipes, > respectively. > > "part_of" can be used to describe sub-recipes such as all > Xorg/KDE/XFCE. In cases where "normal" recipes are included in metas > there's no reason to use "part_of", as it will already have its own > Dependencies files. > > So, in short, I think this is not a problem. For those recipes that > use is_meta due to prefix problems (such as the old TclTk recipe), > /System/Index is coming to alleviate that, and thus they'll need no > more to be described as meta. > > -- > Lucas > powered by /dev/dsp > _______________________________________________ > gobolinux-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel > _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
