On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Hisham Muhammad <his...@gobolinux.org> wrote:
> On 4 March 2015 at 12:26, Sergio Tortosa Benedito <serto...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I have took the time to see GoboLinux projects (in github, yay!) and I > must > > say it's a mess. > > I know. This is the state things were before, with loads of historical > baggage. And you haven't seen the website yet (it's even messier). I'm > working on cleaning it up _minimally_ to be able to upload it. > > > Anyone trying to get into the priject and taking a look will see lots of > > poojects which 50% of them are really dead, so I wanted someone to add a > > way to distinguish which projects are dead from that which are not, > either > > changing them to another account or adding them (dead) or (unmantained) > in > > the name of the repo so that anyone is able to see to diferentiate those > > Of course, github itself will do this by showing first those with latest > > commits, but it may be a good idea to make it more apparent. > > The ones that are "alive" are the ones that are either included in the > Gobo 015 CD or are used in the process of making the CD. > > Lucas, do you have a list of which ones these are? We can then mark > the rest as "[legacy unmaintained repo]" in their description fields. These can be marked as unmaintained: Bootstrap Listener GoboBSD CompileFarm TinyScripts TinyCompile Lua-GoboLinux All other projects are still used by the LiveCD infrastructure or can be considered supported to some extent. Lucas
_______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
