If the distribution builders can take it out, what is preventing them from adding their own documentation?
On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 9:06:26 PM UTC-7, Joshua Chase wrote: > > Yep, that's exactly what I'm saying. > > > https://lists.stg.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/ZLKQK7BOBVQVZ5B2ACQSXCOAOKLVRSTL/ > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038683 > > Supposedly patent/legal reasons? > > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <ia...@golang.org > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 6:59 PM, <jcjosh...@gmail.com <javascript:>> >> wrote: >> > >> > Should there be a note in the documentation that this has been removed >> by >> > the Fedora packagers? >> > >> > It would help assure developers that they're not insane when they get a >> > compile error claiming that something that >> > https://golang.org/pkg/crypto/elliptic says should be there, isn't >> there. >> >> I'm not sure I understand: are you saying that Fedora removed >> crypto/elliptic.P224 when they packaged the Go distribution? Why >> would they do that? >> >> Ian >> > > > > -- > -Josh > (502) 209-9704 > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
