dep is not part of the toolchain.

On Tue, 7 Nov 2017, 08:38 Sotirios Mantziaris, <smantzia...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> would it not make sense them to keep dep out of the std toolchain to adapt
> faster to changes?
>
> On Tuesday, November 7, 2017 at 9:31:01 AM UTC+2, Dave Cheney wrote:
>>
>> If you reported an issue today, Nov 6, you could be waiting nearly 9
>> months to see a fix in the next released version of Go.
>>
>> A project living outside the standard library has little going against it
>> other than you have to compile it yourself.
>>
>> On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 18:28:09 UTC+11, Sotirios Mantziaris wrote:
>>>
>>> I do not know if the times you mentioned are indeed that long.
>>> If it is true then you actually have a good argument.
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, November 7, 2017 at 9:20:08 AM UTC+2, Florin Pățan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I hope not. Anything that ends up in the toolchain is slow to change
>>>> and adapt to user needs. If I have a problem with delve today, I can post
>>>> an issue, fix it and get the next version of delve az quick as a few hours.
>>>> If it would be in the toolchain it could take up to six months to get it
>>>> released.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 7 Nov 2017, 07:04 Sotirios Mantziaris, <smant...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes i know that, but i wonder if it is time to fully integrate delve
>>>>> in the go toolchain and ship it with every release like dep, which exists
>>>>> in another repository, but will be fullly integrated into the toolchain 
>>>>> and
>>>>> the releases in some future version.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tuesday, November 7, 2017 at 1:38:27 AM UTC+2, Florin Pățan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Delve is the one towards which the community rally since gdb, still,
>>>>>> doesn't play nice with goroutines. So, for all intents and purposes, 
>>>>>> delve
>>>>>> is the official debugger and the Go Team and Delve Team do work together 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> give us a better debugging experience. But sometimes the problems that 
>>>>>> need
>>>>>> to be fixed are just too hard to do so quickly.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>>>>> Google Groups "golang-nuts" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/golang-nuts/UY6pvL8qeIw/unsubscribe.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>>>> golang-nuts...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/golang-nuts/UY6pvL8qeIw/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to