>
> These threads are akin to bike shedding thus a waste of time.
In storytelling relief is part of good tragedy.
I consider the overloading of for to be a plus because for, while, do-while
are just loops with conditions. Maybe ‘loop’ is a more Go-like keyword.
loop i, e := range c {
Matt
On Thursday, May 3, 2018 at 8:46:36 AM UTC-5, M P r a d e s wrote:
>
> Can anybody point me to a single discussion on golang-nuts that led to a
> significant syntax change? These threads are akin to bike shedding thus a
> waste of time.
>
> Adding while provide nothing of value in a language that supports basic
> looping. And for those who compare if and switch arguing it is equivalent,
> you can't do type switches with an if statement.
>
> This is discussion is going nowhere.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
