+1 Go doesn't need generics, in fact it goes against its philosophy and core values. Lack of generics was one of the reasons I moved to Go, I worked with Java since version 3, and I do believe that generics just made Java worse.
Regards. понедельник, 17 сентября 2018 г., 19:04:26 UTC+3 пользователь jucie....@zanthus.com.br написал: > > Go core team is working hard to bring generics to the language because > several people asked for it. With all due respect for those users and for > people working hard to make generics a reality, I feel that a greater > number of people would suffer after generics adoption. So, I feel compeled > to manifest my opinion: sorry guys, Go with generics will be worse than Go > without generics. > > The language strives for simplicity since its inception and that is what > attracted a large part of its user base. We must think about who we will > want to have in our community 10 years from now. Supporting generics would > please a minority to the detriment of a large number of potential users. > > Today Go is easy to learn and tools are easy to implement. Please keep it > that way. > > Thanks. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
