On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 11:28 AM vincent163 <hwy1415...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I am thinking about how to write programs like this:
> lock1.Lock()
> err = performOperation1()
> if err != nil {
>   lock1.Unlock()
>   return err
> }
> lock1.Unlock()
> performExpensiveOperation2()

How about this:

lock1.Lock()
err = performOperation1()
lock1.Unlock()
if err != nil {
  return err
}
performExpensiveOperation2()


>
>
> The lock1 must be locked while performing operation1, and I need to use its 
> result to perform operation2. Since operation2 is expensive, I don't want to 
> hold the lock while performing it, and lock1.Unlock() needs to be called 
> before calling operation2.
> Go's defer mechanism doesn't seem to handle this case well since the resource 
> is used only within a block and not throughout the function. Is there a 
> recommended way to write programs in this case?
> I know I could wrap the lock block in a closure, but that creates a 
> completely new scope, so I can't return directly or break out of a loop 
> within the closure, etc.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to