On 5/31/19, Nick Keets <nick.ke...@gmail.com> wrote: ... > This proposal is very interesting and seems to fit nicely into Go, with > minimal disruption. And speaking personally, it would cover 99% of my needs > for generics (I'm not that interested in Min/Max, but writing functions to > get map keys gets old fast). Interesting, could you please share the problems where the usual iterating idiom is not good enough?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CA%2Bctqro9o-RAa6QRVCEQ%2BPu_tre%2BCtJQZaP4LbBTB_6LQntWyg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
