Thank you!
On Wed 13 Nov 2019 at 21:08, Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk> wrote: > On Wed, 2019-11-13 at 06:02 -0800, Serge Hulne wrote: > > Am I therefore correct in assuming that, if the problem I am trying to > model > > is not IO bound or CPU bound, but deals essentially with modeling a large > > number of independent cells (a sort of massively parallel « Game of life > »), > > where each cells lives in its own process, it makes more sense to model > it > > in Golang rather than rust? > > No. At least not per se. > > If you feel more comfortable doing it in Go in preference to Rust that > choose > Go. Another person might have a different background and therefore choose > Rust. The programming languages do not provide the disambiguation, it is > about > the programmer(s), the audience, and the context. > > -- > Russel. > =========================================== > Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 > 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 > London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CA%2BeGGBA4acbJaTu8CjSYkUc4%3DQdd%3Dvt_D9qk36kV0A8Cfbv_Hg%40mail.gmail.com.
