Porsche’s sales are a tiny fraction of auto sales, but most in the industry 
consider it to be the best platform - and only wish they could emulate / afford 
to be in that conversation. 

> On Jan 16, 2020, at 2:10 PM, Liam <networkimp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Open source is a rapidly growing movement across virtually all languages, but 
> still a small minority of all software. So the Trends graph is more revealing 
> than Github activity. Assembly language use on Github also increased by ~150%
> 
> There's no question that Go use is growing rather quickly. It's the mindshare 
> that I'm preoccupied with, because I'd expect that to impact Alphabet Inc's 
> budgeting calculus.
> 
> On a golang-dev thread recently, I raised the point that talking about "Go 2" 
> may have created a widespread misperception (esp among non-users) that a 
> backwards incompatible "v2.0" language is planned.
> 
> This comment on the last Redmonk survey is telling about Go's public 
> perception:
> 
> Go (-1): For the second run in a row, Go dropped one spot, this time out of a 
> tie with R for 15th back to 16th on our list. To be sure, placement in the 
> top twenty is by itself a remarkable achievement; many popular, widely used 
> and beloved languages lay well behind it. But for all of its credibility and 
> usage in widely used, popular projects, Go’s lack of versatility – perceived 
> or otherwise – has limited its upside. Go has remained a solidly top twenty 
> language, but has never placed higher than 14th, and that for only a single 
> quarter. It will also be interesting to see if any of the controversy 
> surrounding Go’s future direction – and the community’s input or lack thereof 
> into that – has any observable impact on the language’s traction moving 
> forward.
> 
> From https://redmonk.com/sogrady/2019/07/18/language-rankings-6-19/
> 
>> On Thursday, January 16, 2020 at 7:33:36 AM UTC-8, Amnon Baron Cohen wrote:
>> Go was originally conceived as a niche language. And if it does what we 
>> need, then I don't think 
>> we need to be particularly bothered if other languages are more "popular".
>> 
>> But when looking at language popularity, I am not sure that the number of 
>> google searches is the most meaningful metric.
>> 
>> Lines of code on github could be more interesting.
>> 
>> FWIW: Githubs octoverse shows shows a 147% growth in Go usage last year.
>> 
>> And more interesting growth stats can be found on the Go blog 
>> https://blog.golang.org/8years
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/5f40c9c1-2ca3-419e-b410-f0f835d63d04%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/0920AC1A-AFAC-482E-BFFD-45CE36ACAE11%40ix.netcom.com.

Reply via email to