On Sunday, January 26, 2020 at 10:27:35 PM UTC-8, pentel...@gmail.com wrote: > > > IMHO, golang didn't make a dent on key areas to become a language of > choice like big data (analytics, complex event processing, etc.) and > consequently, hot topics like artificial intelligence. Exactly areas where > python excels today.
At least when it comes to analytics, ML, AI, there are various languages at play in this space. Python isn't replacing "R" either. I don't think we should expect that it would either. One of Python's intended strengths for AI / ML / analytics involves REPL, which is specifically not a targeted feature of Go. On the other hand, when it comes to situations like the execution of AI / ML models in performance critical environments, I have heard / read of anecdotal evidence of teams opting for Go. The question isn't whether Go making an impact for a specific area, it is whether it is making an impact where it is appropriate. For that, from what I see, the answer is overwhelmingly *yes*. Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/1c8579d4-27b5-470b-a49d-1bca548bc8f7%40googlegroups.com.
