I think they are relevant. It is because the profiler only records a record 
when there is a state transition, which is fine, but then the record needs to 
reflect it, and probably should at least point to the previous record - that is 
- use the same stack trace, so the accounting is correct. 

Seems like a bug to me but it doesn’t appear the Go team either felt the same, 
or had any desire to fix it. 

> On Mar 8, 2020, at 12:37 PM, Xiangdong JI <xiangdong...@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Thanks Robert, I'm trying to utilize the tool now, the new output rendered by 
> goanalyzer contains a page for PC:0 goroutines, which were discussed in 
> #29103, but seems no further details are available, are they considered 
> irrelevant to perf. analysis? 
> 
>> On Thursday, March 5, 2020 at 8:09:18 PM UTC+8, Robert Engels wrote:
>> You might be interested in github.com/robaho/go-analyzer which I believe 
>> significantly improves the profiling information when dealing with highly 
>> concurrent Go programs. 
>> 
>>>> On Mar 5, 2020, at 12:13 AM, Xiangdong JI <xiang...@arm.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks Ian.
>>> 
>>> I'm using schedtrace and scheddetail to help understand the scheduling 
>>> flow, the minimum monitoring window seems to be 1ms only, possible to get 
>>> more detailed info?
>>> Furthermore, sched* outputs extensive logs but what I expect, at present, 
>>> might be something like when a goroutine is parked due to what reason, 
>>> etc., can I get it with the existing diagnostics?  
>>>  
>>> 
>>>> On Thursday, March 5, 2020 at 11:24:23 AM UTC+8, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 6:44 PM Xiangdong JI <xiang...@arm.com> wrote: 
>>>> > 
>>>> > Given the attached screenshot of pprof output, I wonder how to figure 
>>>> > out the callers of 'runtime.mcall' and their cost? Thanks. 
>>>> 
>>>> You can't, but it doesn't matter.  The mcall function is used when a 
>>>> thread changes from executing one goroutine to a different goroutine. 
>>>> Knowing the code that triggers the call into mcall won't tell you 
>>>> anything.  It's just where that goroutine happened to be preempted. 
>>>> 
>>>> Ian 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "golang-nuts" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to golan...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/71ecd07a-0b42-4eba-9b22-5c7cc9821243%40googlegroups.com.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/5b1f728e-68c5-407e-98c6-5e366fc28e53%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/C0D87425-7EF4-48C8-8FD4-A8BE61F8A7FD%40ix.netcom.com.

Reply via email to