On Thu, 2020-10-29 at 22:54 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020, 10:48 PM Denis Cheremisov <
> denis.cheremi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Well, as usual I wrote something in the way, not the real thing.
> > 
> > The case is:
> > 
> > - At my company we are using errgroup from that sync repo in one
> > project,
> >   sync/errgroup in fact mostly.
> > - It proved to be error prone with its context shadowing on
> > errgroup.WithContext
> >   so we took the original and adds context in the group itself via
> > eg.Ctx() + 
> >   a couple of additional functionality.
> > 
> > Yesterday our attorney wrote us "we can't use sync because of this
> > patents
> > note" as it works like a virus, and can't use our modification too
> > for the same
> > reason. It turned out the stdlib is under the same note too, so we
> > will have
> > fun times :) 
> 
> 
> That makes no sense to me.  And I'm not aware of any other company
> that sees any problem at all with the patent grant.
> 
> But I am not a lawyer, and you will have to make your own decisions.
> 
> Ian

Maybe they are worried about this, "This grant does not include claims
that would be infringed only as a consequence of further modification
of this implementation." (that's what it sounds like from the previous
response).

If they are, I think they are misreading it (though I am not a lawyer).


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/2e49ef8893e064727347932cfaa79a71050f419f.camel%40kortschak.io.

Reply via email to