>Apologies then. I assumed you where trying to amend OPs suggestion, >which >was specifically to abscond with type parameters and the ability to >express >constraints. >Note the topic of this thread: »instead of generics, why cant we just >implement an "any" builtin?«
Oops, Sorry for hijacking the thread without changing the title. I do that too often when being whimsically inquisitive. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/67D43CEB-2576-4A9E-939D-DDE2B3CC07D2%40gmail.com.
