>> Seems to me that most generics implementations use a capital letter
>> abstracted type syntax that I hate.
>>
>
>This is just a convention and not part of the syntax, which means it's
>irrelevant to the discussion about the proposal. You can easily use
>lowercase letters/identifiers:
>https://go2goplay.golang.org/p/eWgJSLNTZw8
I was inquiring about the possibility of no identifiers or abstraction but
simply like Gos non generic functions (possibly reversed if needed). Using type
OR type.
func (String | []byte firstInput, myType | publicKey secondInput) {
firstInput[0]
firstInput[[]byte]
}
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/17BEE437-A5BB-4152-8215-B3F27A7265C1%40gmail.com.
