On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 8:03 AM 'Axel Wagner' via golang-nuts < golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Thanks :) At least I didn't overlook anything :) > fwiw, I also searched the spec and found nothing. I found that peculiar. Recursive types require special treatment in type theory, so it is likely any language implementation which supports the notion is bound to grapple with the static semantics of recursive types at some point. Not doing so risk implementations to subtly differ. -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAGrdgiUVQNR3bPpWMP0Y3TXcBXQTg4BwwdGD2-wxktP-w59J6Q%40mail.gmail.com.
