I don’t see any arguments refuting the claim? Can you include a link so the analysis can be read in context?
> On Oct 1, 2022, at 4:13 PM, Anthony Martin <al...@pbrane.org> wrote: > > Robert Engels <reng...@ix.netcom.com> once said: >> I think you’ll find the article interesting. It is certainly written >> by a CS “god” that knows what he’s talking about. > > This is the same "god" that said: > > "Everyone thinks that the concurrency model is Go’s secret > weapon, but I think their concurrency model is actually quite > error prone. That is, you have coroutines with a very basic > message-passing mechanism (channels). But in almost all cases, > the things on one side or the other of the channel are going to > have some shared mutable state guarded with locks." > > Just another heliocentric distortion. Ra blah blah. > > Cheers, > Anthony > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/YzitQt8310011cqe%40alice. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/5C49B740-EADF-465B-94E9-4BDA8CE0C263%40ix.netcom.com.
