It seems to me that the fact that the functions accept and return types from `net/http` (like `http.ResponseWriter` and `http.Handler`) and given that it's nested below `net/http` should make it fairly obvious that it's meant to be used with `net/http`. I also genuinely don't understand what the intersection is of "being tempted to use `httptest`" and "does not intend to be used with `net/http`". I also genuinely don't understand how the behavior of `httptest` could ever cause any harm (quite the opposite).
But, YMMV, of course and you are free to roll your own testing helpers. On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 9:30 AM Simon Walter <siwal...@redhat.com> wrote: > Axel, thanks for providing some context. > > I suppose it is better for me to think of the httptest package as specific > to the http package - although this is not explicitly stated: "Package > httptest provides utilities for HTTP testing" > > This seems misleading as is the case with this '200' default. > > I stopped using httptest.NewRecorder() because of the possibility to > introduce changes to tests that would make tests pass. Not everyone knows > the internals of all the code. Because of this, I think it is risky to have > values set by default to the value that causes the test to pass. > > Some questions that should not keep us awake at night: The test passed, > but will it fail? Will it fail where/how I think it will? > > Simon > > On Monday, October 16, 2023 at 6:16:41 AM UTC+2 Axel Wagner wrote: > >> If you want to argue that `net/http` should not set the response code to >> 200 by default, I would be inclined to agree. I don't particularly like >> that the API even *allows* you not to explicitly set a response code. But >> it does. And while it does, the best test is one that matches the behavior >> of the production environment as closely as possible, full stop. >> >> Another way to look at it: Why do you believe you have to test that your >> handler sets the response code to 200? Why should the test fail, if it >> doesn't do it - given that *the production code* will still end up with the >> right response code? If the response sent to the user is the right one - >> why would it matter whether it was your Handler that set it, or the >> framework? >> >> On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 10:22 PM Simon Walter <siwa...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> How does that explain why it is a good idea? >>> >>> Perhaps my concern is not clear enough. >>> >>> For example: >>> >>> n := 5 >>> funcThatShouldSetNtoFive(&n) >>> if n != 5 { >>> panic("n is not 5) >>> } >>> >>> This is not a good test. >>> >>> I can check if the value has changed by: >>> >>> n := 0 >>> funcThatShouldSetNtoFive(&n) >>> if n != 5 { >>> panic("n is not 5) >>> } >>> >>> That's a bit more sensible. >>> >>> Wouldn't it be less risky for a test to fail by default? Removal of the >>> call to funcThatShouldSetNtoFive, IMO, should result in failure. >>> >>> On Sunday, October 15, 2023 at 6:10:36 PM UTC+2 Axel Wagner wrote: >>> >>>> A default `net/http` server also uses 200 as the default response code. >>>> The behavior of an `http.Handler` not setting a response code should be the >>>> same, if it uses `httptest`, as if it uses `net/http`. >>>> >>>> On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 5:17 PM Simon Walter <siwa...@redhat.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> What is the reason that ResponseRecorder HTTP status code defaults to >>>>> 200? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://cs.opensource.google/go/go/+/refs/tags/go1.21.3:src/net/http/httptest/recorder.go;drc=ff14e844d26090e09aa335d836f737c09a7a0402;l=55 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://cs.opensource.google/go/go/+/refs/tags/go1.21.3:src/net/http/httptest/recorder.go;drc=ff14e844d26090e09aa335d836f737c09a7a0402;l=196 >>>>> >>>>> Can someone explain to me why this is a good idea? Would it not make >>>>> more sense to set it to a value that is not a valid HTTP response code >>>>> such >>>>> as 0? >>>>> >>>>> Simon >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "golang-nuts" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to golang-nuts...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/321a84fa-3aeb-4f3a-ba4f-a05e797652d6n%40googlegroups.com >>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/321a84fa-3aeb-4f3a-ba4f-a05e797652d6n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>> . >>>>> >>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "golang-nuts" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to golang-nuts...@googlegroups.com. >>> >> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/df053fb7-70bf-483d-afd6-4caee9937aa6n%40googlegroups.com >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/df053fb7-70bf-483d-afd6-4caee9937aa6n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/c69a5ab5-a6c7-4609-900d-38e31ddb74bbn%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/c69a5ab5-a6c7-4609-900d-38e31ddb74bbn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAEkBMfEjUug7Ay-ytmpBwAZh0r%3D-XERVciUqrcCQHBTbeoCV6Q%40mail.gmail.com.