Interessantíssimo, o dispersante COREXIT 9500 utilizado para dar um aspecto
de problema resolvido (já que o óleo é dispersado da superfície da água) no
vazamento de óleo no Golfo do México favorece um incremento na contaminação
dos organismos, pelo menos de peixes pelos compostos orgânicos do petróleo!!

Ou seja, jogaram a poeira para debaixo do tapete, só que molharam para fazer
lama.

Segue um artigo sobre o assunto:

Jung, J.H.; Yim, U.H,; Han, G.M.; Shim, W.J. 2009. Biochemical changes in
rockfish, *Sebastes schlegeli*, exposed to dispersed crude oil. Comparative
Biochemistry and Physiology, Part C 150 : 218–223

Abstract:
This paper describes the response of the ovoviviparous rockfish, *Sebastes
schlegeli*, to hydrocarbons in the water-accommodated fraction (WAF) of
crude oil, in the presence or absence of oil dispersants. Concentrations of
cytochrome P-450 1A (CYP1A) and levels of its catalytic activity
ethoxyresorufin O-de-ethylase (EROD) in rockfish exposed to WAF at
concentrations of 0.1% and 1% were significantly increased by the addition
of a dispersant, Corexit 9500 after 48 h exposure. After 72 h exposure, the
levels of CYP1A and EROD activity were significantly increased in 0.1% and
0.01% chemically enhanced WAF (CEWAF) (Corexit 9500 and Hiclean II
dispersant). Bile samples from fish exposed toWAF alone had low
concentrations of hydrocarbon metabolites, exemplified by 1-hydroxypyrene.
After 72 h exposure, hydrocarbon metabolites in bile from fish exposed to
WAF in the presence of either Corexit 9500 or Hiclean II were significantly
higher compared with fish exposed to WAF alone or control fish. These
experiments confirm that the use of oil dispersants will increase the
exposure of ovoviviparous fish to hydrocarbons in oil.


Quem tiver interesse em se aprofundar e solicitar o PDF diretamente ao
autor, fique a vontade, o e-mail dele é: [email protected]

Responder a