Dave Hoover ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Ala Qumsieh wrote: > >Just a stupid question: > > > >Since the best score for Cantor is 34.13, and that for Kolakoski > is 52.13, > >shouldn't BoB be at 86.26 instead of the pathetic 88.28? > > This brings to mind a question I have been meaning to ask. Do you > all want to see BoB in the "High Scores per Hole" or would you rather > see the best score by a legitimate golfer/team?
With 1-hole courses, BoB has always let us know if there's room for improvement. With multi-hole courses, excluding BoB from "High Scores per Hole" hides this information, but I don't see any justification for the hiding.
