On Thu, 2 May 2002, Dave Hoover wrote: > Ala Qumsieh wrote: > >Just a stupid question: > > > >Since the best score for Cantor is 34.13, and that for Kolakoski > is 52.13, > >shouldn't BoB be at 86.26 instead of the pathetic 88.28? > > This brings to mind a question I have been meaning to ask. Do you > all want to see BoB in the "High Scores per Hole" or would you rather > see the best score by a legitimate golfer/team? >
Or do you not want to be able to see either? :-) -- Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK http://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/ "This is Henman's 8th Wimbledon, and he's only lost 7 matches." BBC, 2/Jul/01
