In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It seems to me that both ton's solution and his alternative solution are > incorrect: > What gives? > probably means it's wrong, though i thought what I did was actually portable. What is your perl version ? What is your CPU type ? What do these print for you:
perl -wle 'print 1<<64' perl -wle 'print+(0..3)[2**32]' perl -wle 'print+(0..3)[2**31]'