In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> perl -wle 'print+(0..3)[2**32]'
>
> 3
>
Ok, I totally misjudged what would happen on 32-bit perls, so
my solution is wrong. It's easy enough to fix at the cost of a few
strokes (e.g. using 188/~- instead of 1<< is one that directly
comes to mind). Maybe generating a formula for chr will also work.
So my solution should be either dropped or moved back
a bit. This is where not having judges hurts. We'll need to work out
something fair.
