+1 We're having a similar discussion here:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java/browse_thread/thread/e406e4f77548f803?hl=en Andy, My view is that there is no productivity difference between the two. It might be good to show us what is difficult to do in the datastore but easy in JDO. Cheers, Clay On Sep 23, 11:02 am, datanucleus <andy_jeffer...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > BigTable simply is not a relational db, so it is highly misleading to > > fake a relational wrapper and to me it caused lots of pain. > > Apart from the fact that JDO is not a "relational wrapper". The API > and metadata are object-based; only a subset of metadata is specific > to "mapped" datastores and this is marked clearly in the (DataNucleus) > docs. > > As ever, if you have some specific issue to raise why not define it - > e.g something that can be done in the low level API that can't be done > via a generic API. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
