Please posts how it works, I will need it later this year.
Good luck.
Tim
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 20, 2010, at 9:00 AM, A1programmer <derrick.simp...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I'm very familiar with BlazeDS, but haven't looked into GraniteDS for
a few years.
I know that with BlazeDS, this is done using a streaming AMF channel,
which is essentially an endless http request, or "streaming response".
Since the connection is left open, I am a bit worried that it may not
work on GAE.
However, I did find this,
http://graniteds.blogspot.com/2009/05/graniteds-20-now-supports-server-push.html
which seems to work pretty well. It looks like it still reissues a
new connection every 30 seconds, but if a message happens within the
30 seconds, it immediately gets the response, then rebuilds a new
connection. I'll have to play around with it a bit more to see how
well it works.
Also, this sends identical messages out to multiple clients using a
producer/consumer model. It'll be a little more tricky with a
request/
response model, in which the messages are different for each client
(should still be possible).
Thanks!
On Jan 19, 3:14 pm, Timothy Spear <tsp...@green20now.com> wrote:
I am using GraniteDS for communication from the GAE/J server to a
Flex/
Flash front end. GraniteDS is opensource and supports push based
messaging (I have not tested that aspect).
Good luck.
Tim
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 19, 2010, at 2:48 PM, A1programmer <derrick.simp...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Jason,
Sorry for taking so long to get back to you. That is good to hear.
B.t.w, I have noticed that only a few of the quota item prices are
available, (i.e. not all are listed) such as the number of email
attachments, etc. Does this mean that extra quota allotment for
these
items is not available to be purchased? If I do send email
attachments, they are typically 30k on average. Is this another
area
where rules can be changed, on a case-by-case basis?
I'm actually creating a flash based interface which relies on XML
updates from the server. So it technically runs on the users local
machine. Currently, the only way that I have to get the updates to
the clients is for the client to ask for them. Ideally, I would
want
to use a streaming response, or a Socket server, etc.
Unfortunately,
I need a framework that will allow me to pay more money as my
application growth demands it. I can't really put a lot of cash up
front for a dedicated, or virtual dedicated hosting environment.
This
is yet another thing I really like about GAE.
Thanks,
Derrick
On Jan 13, 5:25 pm, "Jason (Google)" <apija...@google.com> wrote:
That particular term is in place to prevent misuse of our hosting
environment, specifically developers that attempt to deploy the
same
application to multiple IDs and use a "gateway" application to
choose
between these applications randomly to distribute the load evenly.
Unfortunately, the term does exclude more legitimate reasons to use
multiple
application IDs like your use case, although we can grant
exceptions on a
case-by-case basis.
Out of curiosity, how are you implementing the polling? If you use
a single
application and just set up a cron job to run every minute, that
shouldn't
affect the performance of the more interactive aspect of your
application.
- Jason
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:16 AM, A1programmer
<derrick.simp...@gmail.com>wrote:
I know that section 4.4 of the agreement says:
4.4. You may not develop multiple Applications to simulate or act
as a
single Application or otherwise access the Service in a manner
intended to avoid incurring fees.
What if you want multiple applications which act as different
portions
of a larger application for performance reasons? How is it
determined
by Google that your motive is to avoid incurring fees of quota
use.
Or, am I reading the terms of use wrong?
I would like to build a client application which relies on polling
for
a configuration via HTTP which does not effect the performance of
the
primary portion of the application, which lets user set
configurations
at any arbitrary time. One reason being, only one simultaneous
HTTP
request is allowed at a given time for your application. I don't
care
about the quota, because I won't go over it in a single
application,
even with the polling, and I would gladly purchase more HTTP
requests
allowances, I just want the end user experience to perform well.
Thanks!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to
google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-
appengine-java%2B unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com
.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/
group/google-appengine-java?hl=en
.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com
.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en
.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
