Another thing to consider. I'm not using eclipse, and I'm building and running the server with 'ant runserver'. I just realized that ant isn't calling dev_appserver.sh so I haven't been executing those args at all. When I use dev_appserver.sh to run my server it chokes on --jvm_flag but will run with just the -Xmx, however that has no affect.
- Mike On Jun 28, 2:47 pm, Mike Dillon <mikedillo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, > > Yes that is exactly whats going on, the linux box has 4gb of ram, my > mac has 2gb... > > And yes I tried the --jvm_flag=-Xmx512m on my mac with no success. > > - Mike > > On Jun 28, 2:42 pm, Don Schwarz <schwa...@google.com> wrote: > > > > > Have you tried --jvm_flag=-Xmx<whatever>m on your Mac? It should work there > > too. > > > As for the Linux box, the default heap size is different depending on > > whether you have a "server-class" machine or not, so it is possible that you > > are seeing a much higher default heap size just by virtue of using a machine > > with more RAM or more processors. > > > The -Xmx setting you added to dev_appserver.sh has no effect. Your code is > > executed in a subprocess, which is why --jvm_flag must be used to pass Java > > args through to this process. > > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Mike Dillon <mikedillo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks Don, > > > > I forgot to mention that I'm using a mac with the latest snow leopard > > > update. It seems that these heap space > > > commands are incorrect for my machine, because we just tested it on a > > > linux box and it works fine, even > > > without the --jvm_flag prefix. > > > > Any ideas? > > > > - Mike > > > > On Jun 28, 1:18 pm, Don Schwarz <schwa...@google.com> wrote: > > > > I believe you want the following flag: > > > > > --jvm_flag=-Xmx512m > > > > > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Mike Dillon <mikedillo...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > Im working on a project that reads GTFS archives as part of its > > > > > functionality. When we are importing > > > > > a particular set of data that has ~60,000 entries my dev server locks > > > > > up around the 27,000 entry. The > > > > > error is the java heap space error. I would like to know if anyone has > > > > > successfully upped their heap > > > > > space. I searched, and found general instructions but after > > > > > implementing them I'm still failing around > > > > > the same entry. This is leading me to believe that my command line > > > > > args are not taking affect. Here > > > > > is what I have so far: > > > > > > appengine-sdk-java/bin/dev_appserver.sh: > > > > > #!/bin/bash > > > > > # Launches the development AppServer > > > > > [ -z "${DEBUG}" ] || set -x # trace if $DEBUG env. var. is non-zero > > > > > SDK_BIN=`dirname $0 | sed -e "s#^\\([^/]\\)#${PWD}/\\1#"` # sed makes > > > > > absolute > > > > > SDK_LIB=$SDK_BIN/../lib > > > > > SDK_CONFIG=$SDK_BIN/../config/sdk > > > > > java -Xms1024m -Xmx1024m -ea -cp "$SDK_LIB/appengine-tools-api.jar" \ > > > > > com.google.appengine.tools.KickStart \ > > > > > com.google.appengine.tools.development.DevAppServerMain $* > > > > > > Is this correct? > > > > > > Also the way we get our data is through a custom import function that > > > > > chunks the data into groups of 20 > > > > > and then processes them and stores them into the datastore. We are > > > > > only using one instance of the > > > > > persistance manager as per the recommendations to use a singleton > > > > > class. Each batch hits a servlet on > > > > > our app and then does its work. Should we close the persistence > > > > > manager after every batch is completed? > > > > > I'm wondering if this would be a memory leak. > > > > > I believe our documentation recommends storing the > > > PersistenceManagerFactory > > > > as a singleton, but using a new PersistenceManager each time > > > > (remembering > > > to > > > > close it before discarding). > > > > > However, the local implementation of the datastore does keep everything > > > in > > > > memory (and simply flushes to disk periodically), so you will run into > > > size > > > > issues at some point. > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "Google App Engine for Java" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to > > > google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-appengine-java%2B > > > unsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > > > . > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.