I did discover that part of my problem was caused by my generic DAO
class. I ditched the Crank stuff, and I'm writing my own. It seems to
behave much better, and I did move my transaction annotations to the
DAO. That's just going to be something I (we) have to get used to.
Thanks for all the input!
Dave
On 09/29/2010 05:13 AM, Vikas Hazrati wrote:
I can understand the frustration. For GAE we have our transactions at
the dao level unless we know that it can be at the service level.
Since we are banking on the data becoming eventually consistent, we do
not have transaction related problems right now.
And, since they are at the dao level we do not get into the issue you
mentioned. Not sure if you can move your transactions a level down.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google
App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
