I agree with Luis and Vinny. There are a lot better of options for mapping
servlets. One option if you don't want to use frameworks is guice-servlet:

http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/ServletModule

<http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/ServletModule>You can get by
with only one entry in web.xml.

That being said, we relaxed this requirement recently. Are you using release
1.4.0?

--
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine



On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 7:20 AM, Luis Montes <monte...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree with Vinny on this. 100 servlet mappings is excessive. Use and MVC
> framework to handle the mappings and maybe just a few dispatcher servlets.
>
>
> Spring 3.0's MVC allows you to do simple RESTful URL mappings with
> annotations added to simple POJOs
>
>
>
> Luis
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Vinny <xaym...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Would it be a benefit to use one of the many java web frameworks that
>> filter everything though a main controller servlet/filter? 100
>> servlets give me the sense that functionality is being unnecessarily
>> duplicated?
>> --
>> biz: http://www.linkedin.com/in/vincentstoessel/
>> personal: http://www.xaymaca-studios.com/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:34 PM, culov <cul...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I have a very large web app and I have no other recourse besides
>> > either moving away from app engine or having the limit increased.  The
>> > number of URL mappings seems like a very arbitrary property to cap at
>> > 100, and this is simply not enough for many web apps with a wide
>> > scope.  How can I get the limit increased for my app?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Ivan
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to
>> google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>> .
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Google App Engine for Java" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to
>> google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
>>
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App Engine for Java" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
> google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.

Reply via email to