maven thoughts - anyone who's worked on a large project over time has seen the build scripts grow in complexity and maintenance costs
- maven, like many solutions, introduces a domain-specific-language to simplify things, or in mavens case, a domain specific XML schema - I usually cringe when I see a new dsl. just one more unnatural thing to learn - however in practice, I've seen maven greatly simplify and standardize large scale development (dozens of developers working together on dozens of projects) - as always - UTRTFTJ use the right tool for the job - as for app engine, I don't use a build script. stand-alone eclipse works fine with a few developers on a project On May 23, 8:08 pm, Brandon Donnelson <branflake2...@gmail.com> wrote: > I see nothing wrong with what you said. Its fun to see others perspectives. > That's what this group is all about. :) > On May 23, 2011 4:58 PM, "Rusty Wright" <rwright.li...@gmail.com> wrote:> > Sorry, my post was slightly tongue in cheek; sometimes I can't resist > > sticking a twig into a hornet's nest. > > > On 2011-05-23 08:26, Ugorji wrote: > >> +1 all the way to Jeff's comments. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google App Engine for Java" group.> To post to this group, send email to > > google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.> To unsubscribe from this group, send > email to > > google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.> For more options, visit > this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
