Thanks, I'd found that, I'm curious how it's implemented, since I made some
efforts in that direction myself a while back.

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Yasuo Higa <higaya...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Dennis,
>
> The following document will help you about global transactions:
> http://sites.google.com/site/slim3appengine/#gtx
>
> Yasuo Higa
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Dennis Peterson
> <dennisbpeter...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Those multi-entity transactions are definitely interesting to me. There's
> > some overhead but no getting around that.
> > A while back I was playing around with some adhoc  methods to do it in a
> > specific case, but I suspect Slim3 is more solid and maybe faster than
> what
> > I was doing. Definitely easier. When I get a chance I want to dig in and
> > find out how it works.
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Mike Lawrence <m...@systemsplanet.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I get...
> >>
> >> The number of entities: 10000
> >> low level 1717 millis
> >> slim3 1502 millis
> >> objectify 2970 millis
> >> jdo 3485 millis
> >>
> >> probably should modify this example
> >> to do an average of several runs
> >>
> >> one important thing to note, is slim3 allows you
> >> to update multiple entity types
> >> in a single transaction.
> >> not possible with the other 3 APIs
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jun 7, 4:00 am, Ian Marshall <ianmarshall...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > The low-level API does indeed look very fast.
> >> >
> >> > Just a comment on JDO: repeat runs roughly halve the JDO run time. I
> >> > presume that this is because for repeat runs the JDO persistence
> >> > manager factory has already been constructed.
> >> >
> >> > On Jun 6, 8:44 pm, DennisP <dennisbpeter...@gmail.com> wrote:> I'm
> >> > looking at this online demo:http://slim3demo.appspot.com/performance/
> >> >
> >> > > Sample run:
> >> > > The number of entities: 10000
> >> > > low-level API:get: 2 millis
> >> > > Slim3: 2490 millis
> >> > > JDO: 6030 millis
> >> >
> >> > > Is the low-level API really that much faster?
> >>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> >> "Google App Engine for Java" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to
> >> google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
> >>
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Google App Engine for Java" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to
> google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App Engine for Java" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
> google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.

Reply via email to