On Tuesday, December 6, 2011 10:20:58 PM UTC+1, David Chandler wrote: > > Objectify works great with RequestFactory:
Indeed! I'm already using RequestFactory (partly with the ServiceLocator pattern) and JPA2 at my company's project. Thanks to your example<http://turbomanage.wordpress.com/2011/03/25/using-gwt-requestfactory-with-objectify/>, I've also managed to implement Objectify&RF in my private GAE project. http://code.google.com/p/listwidget/ > Maybe you should post a *big link* in your example<http://turbomanage.wordpress.com/2011/03/25/using-gwt-requestfactory-with-objectify/> to this repo. It could spare many people much time :) > Do you have a specific concern about it? > No specific concerns, beside maybe I don't want to use something non-standard (in contrast to JPA) and GAE-specific like Objectify. However today I've read that Datanucleus finally supports JPA2! As I've gathered experience with JPA2 at my company's project, so I'll go with Datanucleus. Whether you use RF with plain JPA2 or with Datanucleus should not make any difference, right? -Alex -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine-java/-/QJVOn9CJz9IJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
