I noticed that nearly all the non-tick days on the status pages say "investigating", even going back over a year! On Mar 20, 2012 7:21 AM, "doright" <doug.stodd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would like to add my voice to this expression of concern that Google is > not delivering on its promises. > > I have been running a GAEJ Saas since the end of 2009. On Friday I had my > first discussion with a paying client of mine who now has serious doubts > that my application will be able to support his business, given the > performance he's seen in the last few weeks, notably the big delays seen on > Friday. I was checking the system status that day and it said "anomaly" > across all languages and "investigating" Peformance was truly terrible with > errors, huge latencies and lots of loading requests. I was keen to see > what the official investigation would turn up, but incredulous to see that > its now just marked as a tick for that day! To me this is a serious breach > of trust. It smells of cover up. > > I have a paid app, and have been experimenting for a while now with > fine-tuning, min instances, max instances, pending latencies etc. I am now > experimenting with warm-up requests but even that is not very evident, and > I have yet to have it working. Documentation is definitely lacking in this > crucial area. > > From what I read on these forums lately I see a huge amount of concern > from the community and a deafening silence from Google. Is this really the > thanks we get for being early adopters and trusting Google to deliver on > their promises? Don't get me wrong I've been very impressed with GAE and > the rate at which features are being rolled out, however this cannot be at > the expense of stability and performance. I really fear I might now lose > everything that I've built up over the last 18 months because my client > trust is being eroded by all of these problems. I can't even blame Google > coz they haven't even put out a statement. > > Googlers, how do I raise this to a production issue? Its make or break > now for my application. > > > > On Saturday, March 10, 2012 9:23:29 AM UTC+1, andrew wrote: >> >> Yes. More votes for a Google response on this. >> >> Anyone with a premium account and better support want to take up the >> cause on all our behalf? >> >> Submit a defect report we can all star? >> Please post link to it here.... >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine for Java" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine-java/-/6HX2lHpopPYJ. > To post to this group, send email to > google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
