Thank you for the quick response! I really appreciate the feedback. Cheers
On Sep 11, 2:34 pm, "Marzia Niccolai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Tony, > > The Admin Console does not currently display entities that only contain > non-editable fields (such as BlobProperties or TextProperties). > > -Marzia > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Tony Arkles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It's on the admin console in the App Engine. The Feed Kind doesn't > > show up in either the "Query the datastore" or "Create an Entity" list > > of Kinds. > > > Not sure if it makes any difference, but the feed object only has one > > field, which is a blob. Maybe they're hidden because there's nothing > > that would be displayable or editable? (We reference it based on its > > key_name) > > > If I look locally, I can search for them and it works OK... > > > Thanks for the help Bill :) > > > On Sep 11, 2:14 pm, Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is this locally or the admin console up in App Engine? I would check > > > your index.yaml and make sure the missing Kind is listed. If local, > > > I'd restart the server. > > > > On Sep 11, 1:07 pm, Tony Arkles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > It definitely has Entities in it. If I do a Feed.all(), I get a bunch > > > > of objects back. (I can dump the content back and get what I expect). > > > > It's just a bit concerning that it's missing from the Admin Console. > > > > > On Sep 11, 2:01 pm, Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Custom key name shouldn't matter. Does the missing Kind have any > > > > > entities stored in it? I believe empty Kinds, even if they are > > > > > defined in index.yaml, won't show up in the console until there are > > > > > stored entities. > > > > > > On Sep 11, 12:56 pm, Tony Arkles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > Right now my app has 4 different Entity kinds that get stored in > > the > > > > > > Datastore. In the Admin Console Data Viewer, I can see 3 of them, > > but > > > > > > not the 4th. The only thing that's different (other than the fact > > > > > > that they have different fields) is that the missing one uses a > > custom > > > > > > key_name. > > > > > > > If that's "expected behaviour", is there any easy way to get at > > that > > > > > > data without writing code to do it? > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > Tony > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
