How about your model? What 'shape' is it? Do you have any string properties that don't need to be indexed?
It does seem quite odd that a simple put like that is getting a warning though. It basically makes an app useless if that is a proper recording. On Oct 2, 2:27 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to build a system where a shopkeeper can list promotional > items and mark their store on a map, so that anyone searching for > those items can find a place nearby that has a deal on them. The idea > is that a shopkeeper has just one store/identity, but they may have > multiple items, which I want searchable, so I'm using implicit > references, as it seems like a good way to go. > > Here's my code for saving the sale. Ignore all the long/lat stuff; > that's a different conversation: > > class SaveSale(webapp.RequestHandler): > def get(self): > > address = cgi.escape(self.request.get('address')) > lattitude,longitude = > cgi.escape(self.request.get('point')).split(',') > wholeLat,decLat = lattitude.split('.') > mLat = wholeLat + decLat[0] > wholeLong,decLong = longitude.split('.') > mLon = wholeLong + decLong[0] > > token = str(mLon)+','+str(mLat) > > sale = SaleLocation(longitude = longitude, > lattitude = lattitude, > address = address, > region = token).put() > SaleItem(salelocation = sale, > name = 'itemName').put() # hard-coded for now, just for > testing purposes > > self.response.headers['Content-Type'] = 'text/xml' > self.response.out.write('<response><note>Sale Saved</note></ > response>') > > If I take out that "SaleItem(...).put()" command, I get a very > reasonable average CPU reading of something like 300-400. With it in, > this save action immediately gets a CPU warning with values ranging > from 800 to well over 1000. > > Gets are a lot lighter, so I'm not worried about the overall volume, > but I'm concerned that something that is ostensibly supported in the > documentation can't be done without a CPU warning. That warning says > the code should be optimized, but there's just not that much there to > optimize. > I realize that I could put this value in an array within the > SaleLocation object, or even in a comma delimited string in the > SaleLocation object, but that defeats the fairly elegant purpose of > the implicit link between these objects. > > Is there a way to do things this way and reduce the CPU impact, or am > I screwed? Alternately, is the CPU meter screwed, in which case, > should I plunder forward, assuming it'll be fixed? > > Best, > > Ben --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---