The model is super simple; at this point, the only field that's being
indexed is the "region", which is a normalized/tokenized version of
the latitude/longitude pair.
Best,
Ben
On Oct 2, 2:39 pm, uprise78 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about your model? What 'shape' is it? Do you have any string
> properties that don't need to be indexed?
>
> It does seem quite odd that a simple put like that is getting a
> warning though. It basically makes an app useless if that is a proper
> recording.
>
> On Oct 2, 2:27 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to build a system where a shopkeeper can list promotional
> > items and mark their store on a map, so that anyone searching for
> > those items can find a place nearby that has a deal on them. The idea
> > is that a shopkeeper has just one store/identity, but they may have
> > multiple items, which I want searchable, so I'm using implicit
> > references, as it seems like a good way to go.
>
> > Here's my code for saving the sale. Ignore all the long/lat stuff;
> > that's a different conversation:
>
> > class SaveSale(webapp.RequestHandler):
> > def get(self):
>
> > address = cgi.escape(self.request.get('address'))
> > lattitude,longitude =
> > cgi.escape(self.request.get('point')).split(',')
> > wholeLat,decLat = lattitude.split('.')
> > mLat = wholeLat + decLat[0]
> > wholeLong,decLong = longitude.split('.')
> > mLon = wholeLong + decLong[0]
>
> > token = str(mLon)+','+str(mLat)
>
> > sale = SaleLocation(longitude = longitude,
> > lattitude = lattitude,
> > address = address,
> > region = token).put()
> > SaleItem(salelocation = sale,
> > name = 'itemName').put() # hard-coded for now, just for
> > testing purposes
>
> > self.response.headers['Content-Type'] = 'text/xml'
> > self.response.out.write('<response><note>Sale Saved</note></
> > response>')
>
> > If I take out that "SaleItem(...).put()" command, I get a very
> > reasonable average CPU reading of something like 300-400. With it in,
> > this save action immediately gets a CPU warning with values ranging
> > from 800 to well over 1000.
>
> > Gets are a lot lighter, so I'm not worried about the overall volume,
> > but I'm concerned that something that is ostensibly supported in the
> > documentation can't be done without a CPU warning. That warning says
> > the code should be optimized, but there's just not that much there to
> > optimize.
> > I realize that I could put this value in an array within the
> > SaleLocation object, or even in a comma delimited string in the
> > SaleLocation object, but that defeats the fairly elegant purpose of
> > the implicit link between these objects.
>
> > Is there a way to do things this way and reduce the CPU impact, or am
> > I screwed? Alternately, is the CPU meter screwed, in which case,
> > should I plunder forward, assuming it'll be fixed?
>
> > Best,
>
> > Ben
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
