here http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/d28216f1d350abba/
2008/11/20 riklaunim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Is this patch available somewhere? > > @@ napisał(a): > > hi i have django admin works on app engine helper with some modifications > > (both django admin and app engine helper) . > > > > demo: http://djangoadmin.appspot.com/admin/< > http://djangoadmin.appspot.com/admin/> > > > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 2:42 AM, Arash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Unfortunately you will not get Django's scaffolded admin interface in > > > none of them > > > > > > On Oct 29, 1:52 pm, Adam Fisk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I highly recommend app engine patch. It's a much more active project > > > > than app engine helper, and it works really well. > > > > > > > > -Adam > > > > > > > > On Oct 29, 10:04 am, "Dan Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I'd recommend Django 1.0 along with the Helper or something > similar. > > > You > > > > > could use Django without the Helper if you accommodate some of the > > > import > > > > > technicalities, the Helper just makes it easier. This article > > > discusses > > > > > using Django without the Helper (though I'm not sure if the article > > > works > > > > > out of the box with Django 1.0): > > > http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/django.html > > > > > > > > > See also the article on using the Helper, and the article on using > > > Django > > > > > 1.0 via a feature called zipimport (which the Helper also > supports): > > > > > > > > http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/appengine_helper_for_django. > .. > > > > > http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/django10_zipimport.html > > > > > > > > > As far as compatibility goes, the runtime environment is versioned, > > > with the > > > > > intent that changes to a given version of the runtime will remain > > > backwards > > > > > compatible with apps that run with that version. When a new > version of > > > the > > > > > runtime environment is released containing incompatible changes, > your > > > app > > > > > will continue to use the original version until you update your > > > app.yaml > > > > > file. I haven't tried appenginepatch, but a version of it that > works > > > with > > > > > v1 of the Python runtime ought to continue to do so even when > there's a > > > v2. > > > > > > > > > -- Dan > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Daniel Larkin < > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to use Django on GAE for a small project. Ideally I'd > like > > > to > > > > > > use version 1.0 of Django rather than 0.96, and I'm aware there > are > > > > > > various patches and helper scripts etc to make this possible. > Yet, > > > > > > these approaches seem less than straight-forward (perhaps I'm > > > > > > incorrect there? I haven't actually tried them) and are such > patches > > > > > > going to break with newer versions of GAE. After initially > deciding > > > to > > > > > > use Django 1.0, I'm now considering just using the built-in 0.96 > > > > > > version, would this be such a bad idea for someone moving from > php- > > > > > > land to an elegant python MVC design pattern based solution. > > > > > > > > > > Any comments would be greatly appreciated! > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
