On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 3:08 AM, Amir Michail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 3:07 AM, Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> When doing a urlfetch, it may take quite a long time. As this is not >>> a CPU usage issue, what's the point of limiting the request time >>> anyway? Why not allow the request to go on for a minute or so? >> Because it ties up memory for the duration of the request. Imagine if >> they allowed hour long requests - it would be easy to swamp machines >> with requests waiting for a response.
Or just handle it with some sort of memory quota. Amir > > Ok, but what about one minute requests? What would the impact be? > > Amir > >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > http://b4utweet.com > http://chatbotgame.com > http://numbrosia.com > http://twitter.com/amichail > -- http://b4utweet.com http://chatbotgame.com http://numbrosia.com http://twitter.com/amichail --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
