Well partially. Obviously I would prefer compressing the file by a factor 10 and then send less data, without setting the right content- encoding this is impossible though.
Bigger files would at least not totally invalidate appengine for my use. Still it is no replacement for the content-encoding feature. On Dec 9, 9:59 am, Thomas Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi jago, > > As per the roadmap (http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/ > roadmap.html); "Service for storing and serving large files" will be > coming in the October '08 - March '09 timeline. That should solve your > problem, if I'm not mistaken? > > Personally, I hope that applies to regular old static content and code > as well, ideally including lifting the 1.000 file limit, but probably > not. > > On Dec 9, 8:43 am, jago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I would like to host an applet on appengine. Still either I compress > > the jars with pack200 which brings the size of each jar well below 1MB > > but then I have no content-encoding. Or, I don't compess the jars and > > hit the 1MB filesize limitation. > > > AppEngine really has become frustrating. There are just too many > > limitations. Will this ever change? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
