I guess I'm stuck with that--it works nicely despite trouble getting
the stylesheets to load. This seems like such a simple feature for
google to implement, I  don't understand why they dont.

On Jan 9, 7:51 am, nickcharb <nickch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I found appengine_admin helpful to add dummy data.  It's a very nice
> interface, and all you have to do is define the models/properties you
> want exposed to the forms for view/edit/etc.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/appengine-admin/
>
> Nick
>
> On Jan 9, 4:38 am, Alexander Kojevnikov <alexan...@kojevnikov.com>
> wrote:
>
> > > Thanks for the response. I just dont see a reason why Google can't
> > > allow dummy data to be entered via the built in admin interface. If it
> > > can create forms when there is data, why cant it create forms without
> > > data?
>
> > I guess the main reason is that the datastore is schema-less, the
> > models can and will change at runtime. Also, the model classes can be
> > defined and re-defined in any module of the project, I guess it's a
> > non-trivial task to figure out what the final model definition would
> > be.
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to