I guess I'm stuck with that--it works nicely despite trouble getting the stylesheets to load. This seems like such a simple feature for google to implement, I don't understand why they dont.
On Jan 9, 7:51 am, nickcharb <nickch...@gmail.com> wrote: > I found appengine_admin helpful to add dummy data. It's a very nice > interface, and all you have to do is define the models/properties you > want exposed to the forms for view/edit/etc. > > http://code.google.com/p/appengine-admin/ > > Nick > > On Jan 9, 4:38 am, Alexander Kojevnikov <alexan...@kojevnikov.com> > wrote: > > > > Thanks for the response. I just dont see a reason why Google can't > > > allow dummy data to be entered via the built in admin interface. If it > > > can create forms when there is data, why cant it create forms without > > > data? > > > I guess the main reason is that the datastore is schema-less, the > > models can and will change at runtime. Also, the model classes can be > > defined and re-defined in any module of the project, I guess it's a > > non-trivial task to figure out what the final model definition would > > be. > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---