wow, awesome. thanks for implementing this, rodrigo! (and sorry for exploding your head. :P)
On Jan 28, 9:42 pm, Rodrigo Moraes <rodrigo.mor...@gmail.com> wrote: > ooops, sorry, let me correct the result i got. only the third query > doesn't match the one in ryan's doc: > > Original: > ----------- > WHERE x = B.x AND y = B.y AND __key__ > B ORDER BY __key__ ASC > WHERE x = B.x AND y < B.y ORDER BY y DESC, __key__ ASC > WHERE x > B.x ORDER BY x ASC, y DESC, __key__ ASC > > This is what i get: > ----------- > WHERE x = B.x AND y = B.y AND __key__ > B ORDER BY __key__ ASC > WHERE x = B.x AND y < B.y ORDER BY y DESC, __key__ ASC > WHERE x > B.x AND y = B.y ORDER BY x ASC, __key__ ASC this is for an original query of 'ORDER BY x ASC, y DESC', right? i believe my third derived query, ie without the y = B.y filter, is right. one way to think about it is that the original query only has sort orders, not filters, so it should return *every* entity that has an x property and a y property. say the bookmark is B(x = 1, y = 1). with your set of derived queries, no entity with x > 1 and y > 1 will ever be returned, since every query has either an x = 1 filter or a y = 1 filter. however, if you remove the y = B.y filter from the last derived query (and add the y DESC sort order), it will include all of entities with x > 1 and y > 1. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
