I am the author of the blog post. <b>Update (20090324):</b> According to <a href="http:// kbyanc.blogspot.com/2007/07/python-serializer-benchmarks.html" rel="nofollow">Extra Cheese</a>, cjson 1.0.5 has an incompatibility with simplejson in processing slashes. A fix is available from <a href="http://www.vazor.com/cjson.html"; rel="nofollow">Matt Billenstein</a>. However, Dan Pascu, the author of cjson, deprecates Matt Billenstein's cjson 1.0.6 because Matt's patch parses the JSON twice, which makes it twice as slow. This will still be faster than all alternatives in certain circumstances. You will not find Matt's cjson on the cheeseshop, only on Matt's site.
On Mar 23, 10:55 am, Andy Freeman <ana...@earthlink.net> wrote: > According > tohttp://blog.metaoptimize.com/2009/03/22/fast-deserialization-in-python/ > , simplejson is significantly slower than cjson. > > I've created an issue requesting the fastest possible json > athttp://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1174. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
