Hi bFlood,

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:52 PM, bFlood<bflood...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> hey nick
>
> is there any optimized way to have a python app call a java app in the
> same GAE application? my guess is no, except through UrlFetch but I
> figured I would ask anyway

Currently URLFetch is your only option. Once there's Java support for
Task Queues, though, you could do messaging in one direction by having
the non-default version enqueue a task queue item for the default
version.

>
> also, do Python/Java versions in same GAE app share teh same memcache
> as well?

Yes.

-Nick Johnson

> thecheers
> brian
>
> On Jul 31, 8:47 am, "Nick Johnson (Google)" <nick.john...@google.com>
> wrote:
>> Hi radaczynski,
>>
>> Java and Python apps run in the same environment (eg, you can have one
>> major version be Python, and another Java), so yes, the same applies
>> to Python. We don't currently have plans to change this, as alternate
>> major versions using the same datastore is essential for most people
>> deploying and rolling out new versions.
>>
>> -Nick Johnson
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:49 PM, radaczynski<radaczyn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>>
>> > I have found info in the Javadocs that although there can be multple
>> > versions of the app, there is only one datastore for all of them. Is
>> > it the same for python? Are there any plans to version the datastore
>> > as well? Or should the apps just roll their own versioning scheme and
>> > data migration?
>>
>> --
>> Nick Johnson, Developer Programs Engineer, App Engine
> >
>



-- 
Nick Johnson, Developer Programs Engineer, App Engine

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to