2009/11/29 Eric <shel...@gmail.com>:
> Thanks for all your comments.
> Regarding Python/Java speed, 99% of the runtime is spent iterating in
> an attempt to converge to some numerical solution .
> Loops, arithmetic and memory updates. I would guess an interpreted
> language like Python (am I right?) would be much slower.
>

You can try a simulation test before your decision.

> About the instance set up time, I agree that if query frequency
> suddenly rises from 100/sec to 200/sec the system I suggested would
> stall, but I'm don't think I'm expecting such drastic changes in a
> small amount of time.
> Regarding my suggestion on new instance creation, don't I have a say
> on when and how that happens? Or is it totally up to AppEngine to
> define when a new instance is created? Can I, for example, have 10
> instances that are simply waiting for situations like Keakon
> described?

At least not right now, It's up to the app master.
http://code.google.com/events/io/2009/sessions/FromSparkPlugToDriveTrain.html

> I'm trying to form some intuitive picture of how GAE works by guessing
> and  hoping to be corrected by someone when/if I'm wrong.
> Maybe I require a cloud platform that allows tinkering at lower
> levels?
>
> On Nov 28, 9:54 pm, Andy Freeman <ana...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> > Maybe I don't understand something, but why should the 5 second setup
>> > on a new instance bother me? A new instance should be created when
>> > other instances are near capacity, and not when they exceed it, right?
>> > So once initialized it can be "dummy-run" internally and only
>> > available 5 seconds later while the existing instance continue to take
>> > care of the incoming queries.
>>
>> What makes you think that the request that causes the creation of a
>> new instance doesn't wait for the creation of said instance?  (The
>> scheme you suggest is plausible, but why do you think that it's how
>> appengine works?)
>>
>> On Nov 28, 9:03 am, Eric <shel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks for the response.
>>
>> > Maybe I don't understand something, but why should the 5 second setup
>> > on a new instance bother me? A new instance should be created when
>> > other instances are near capacity, and not when they exceed it, right?
>> > So once initialized it can be "dummy-run" internally and only
>> > available 5 seconds later while the existing instance continue to take
>> > care of the incoming queries.
>>
>> > Also, do you think the latency requirements are realistic with GAE?
>> > That is, in the ordinary case, could the response be consistently
>> > served back to the querying user with delay of max 3 seconds?
>>
>> > On Nov 28, 8:35 am, 风笑雪 <kea...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > The White House hosted an online town hall meeting on GAE with GWT,
>> > > and received 700 hits per second at its 
>> > > peak.http://google-code-updates.blogspot.com/2009/04/google-developer-prod...
>>
>> > > But more than 1000 queries a second is never been tested.
>>
>> > > I think Java is not a good choice in your case. When your user
>> > > suddenly increasing, starting a new Jave instance may cost more than 5
>> > > seconds, while Python needs less than 1 second.
>>
>> > > 2009/11/27 Eric <shel...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> > > > Hi,
>>
>> > > > I wish to set up a CPU-intensive time-important query service for
>> > > > users on the internet.
>> > > > Is GAE with Java the right choice? (as compared to other clouds, or
>> > > > non-cloud architecture)
>> > > > Specifically, in terms of:
>> > > > 1) pricing
>> > > > 2) latency resulting from slow CPU, JIT compiles, etc..
>> > > > 3) latency resulting from communication of processes inside the cloud
>> > > > (e.g. a queuing process and a calculation process)
>> > > > 4) latency of communication between cloud and end user
>>
>> > > > A usage scenario I am expecting is:
>> > > > - a typical user sends a query (XML of size around 1K) once every 30
>> > > > seconds on average,
>> > > > - Each query requires a numerical computation of average time 0.2 sec
>> > > > and max time 1 sec (on a 1 GHz Pentium). The computation requires no
>> > > > data other than the query itself.
>> > > > - The delay a user experiences between sending a query and receiving a
>> > > > response should be on average no more than 2 seconds and in general no
>> > > > more than 5 seconds.
>> > > > - A background save to a DB of the response should occur (not time
>> > > > critical)
>> > > > - There can be up to 30000 simultaneous users - i.e., on average 1000
>> > > > queries a second, each requiring an average 0.2 sec calculation, so
>> > > > that would necessitate around 200 CPUs.
>>
>> > > > Is this feasible on GAE Java?
>> > > > If so, where can I learn about the correct design methodology for such
>> > > > a project on GAE?
>>
>> > > > If this is the wrong forum to ask this, I'd appreciate redirection.
>>
>> > > > Thanks,
>>
>> > > > Eric
>>
>> > > > --
>>
>> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> > > > Groups "Google App Engine" group.
>> > > > To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
>> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> > > > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> > > > For more options, visit this group 
>> > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.-Hide quoted 
>> > > > text -
>>
>> > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Google App Engine" group.
> To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>
>
>

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.


Reply via email to