I totally agree with you. It is very difficult to design around the large variations in performance; more consistency would make me happy as well.
I try to leave lot of room for latency spikes in my designs and optimize my data designs to minimize RPCs, but that is sometimes very difficult. Robert On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 04:48, Dennis <dennisf...@gmail.com> wrote: > My reads are serial because there is some dependency on earlier reads. > But the main point is that it was working fine before. > The allowed capability of the current appengine platform is different from > the allowed capabilities of, say, last week's platform. > To have the platform's capabilities change is very dramatic and affects > apps. > That's why it seems like the appengine platform is currently up and running, > but not at it's "normal' level. > By the way, it would be desirable to be able to test my app when the > appengine platform is running at this > lower level of capability. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
